The fallacy of the Scrum Master as a Project Manager: Unveiling True Agile Leadership

The fallacy of the Scrum Master as a Project Manager: Unveiling True Agile Leadership

Scrum Masters are often miscast as traditional project managers, especially in organisations under pressure to “speed things up”.

That misunderstanding creates predictable failure modes: more reporting, more task assignment, less ownership, and teams that wait for direction.

If you want Agile outcomes, the Scrum Master role needs to stay true to its purpose: enabling a self-managing Scrum Team and improving the system around it.

Key takeaways

  • Scrum Masters are not project managers, and should not be used as “delivery admins”.
  • Scrum works best with self-managing, cross-functional teams and clear accountabilities.
  • The Scrum Master is a coach and facilitator, focused on flow, value, and impediment removal.
  • If you turn Scrum Events (aka Ceremonies) into status meetings, you will slow delivery down.
  • Fix the system first: decision latency, dependencies, and leadership behaviours.

Challenge / why this matters

In many UAE and GCC organisations, delivery pressure is high.

When dates slip, it is tempting to “add control” by turning the Scrum Master into a project manager.

That tends to backfire.

Scrum was designed to reduce the need for central task control by creating transparency and enabling teams to inspect and adapt.

When you treat the Scrum Master as the person who assigns work, chases updates, and owns the plan, you remove the conditions Scrum needs to work.

If you are seeing “Scrum but slower”, you may also be dealing with a broader pattern of mechanical adoption: Read about Mechanical Scrum ↗

Approach / how it works

A simple way to understand the difference is this:

  • Project management focuses on controlling delivery through plans and direction.
  • Scrum focuses on enabling delivery through transparency, collaboration, and adaptation.

Both aim to improve outcomes, but they do it in very different ways.

1) What a project manager is typically accountable for

In many organisations, a project manager is accountable for:

  • planning and scheduling work
  • managing scope, risks, and dependencies
  • assigning tasks and tracking completion
  • reporting status to stakeholders
  • ensuring delivery against constraints (time, cost, scope)

This can be effective in predictable work with stable requirements.

In complex product delivery, it often increases overhead and reduces learning speed.

2) What a Scrum Master is accountable for

A Scrum Master is accountable for Scrum effectiveness.

Practically, that means they help the Scrum Team and the wider organisation:

  • understand and apply Scrum well
  • improve collaboration and focus on outcomes
  • remove or reduce impediments that slow delivery
  • create an environment for self-management
  • facilitate Scrum Events (aka Ceremonies) when needed or requested
  • coach stakeholders so interactions support value delivery

They do not assign tasks.

They do not “own the plan”.

They do not act as the single throat to choke when delivery is hard.

3) The heart of Scrum: self-managing teams

Scrum depends on self-management.

That is not a motivational poster. It is a delivery design choice.

In a self-managing team:

  • Developers decide how to turn selected Product Backlog Items into a Done Increment
  • the Scrum Team collaborates to plan and adjust based on evidence
  • decisions are made close to the work, within clear boundaries
  • the team owns delivery outcomes, not just activities

In practice, teams become faster because they reduce decision latency.

That matters in GCC environments where complex stakeholder networks can otherwise slow everything down.

4) Common anti-patterns when Scrum Masters become project managers

These are some of the most common warning signs.

  • Scrum Events (aka Ceremonies) become status reporting sessions.
  • The Scrum Master assigns work to Developers from the Sprint Backlog.
  • The Scrum Master is expected to “chase” other departments for action.
  • The Sprint Goal is replaced by a delivery checklist with no value focus.
  • Stakeholders bypass the Product Backlog with urgent requests and escalations.

When these patterns show up, the organisation often believes it is “adding control”.

In reality, it is increasing coordination overhead and reducing ownership.

5) Where delivery coordination fits without turning Scrum Masters into PMs

This is the part many organisations miss.

Delivery coordination is real work.

It just needs to sit in the right place.

Common options that work well:

  • A Delivery Lead or Programme role outside the Scrum Team handles portfolio-level coordination and governance.
  • The Product Owner owns prioritisation, stakeholder alignment, and the Product Backlog.
  • The Scrum Master coaches and improves the system so the team can deliver predictably.
  • The team makes day-to-day delivery decisions and keeps work transparent.

If your organisation is scaling beyond a few teams, this becomes an operating model design question.

That is why it helps to understand the relationship between structure and outcomes: Explore Scaled Agile alternatives ↗

Results / expected outcomes

When Scrum Master and project management accountabilities are separated cleanly, you typically see:

  • clearer ownership and fewer handoffs
  • less “delivery admin” work inside the team
  • stronger Sprint Goals and better focus
  • fewer escalations because decisions happen earlier
  • more honest transparency, which improves risk management

What you should avoid promising is “faster delivery” purely by renaming roles.

Outcomes improve when teams can self-manage, impediments are removed quickly, and stakeholders engage through the right channels.

Practical takeaways / what to do next

If you want Scrum Masters to add real value, here are practical steps that tend to work.

1) Reset expectations with leadership

Agree what the Scrum Master is and is not accountable for.

Useful “not accountable for” examples:

  • owning delivery dates
  • writing the plan
  • assigning tasks
  • being the status reporting function

If leadership needs someone to manage programme governance, name that role explicitly.

2) Protect self-management in the team

Ensure Developers are the ones who:

  • plan the work for the Sprint
  • manage day-to-day coordination
  • update artefacts transparently
  • raise impediments early, with proposed options

The Scrum Master supports this, but does not take it over.

3) Make Scrum Events (aka Ceremonies) outcome-led

A quick health check:

  • Sprint Planning produces a clear Sprint Goal and a realistic plan.
  • Daily Scrum is about progress towards the Sprint Goal, not reporting to a manager.
  • Sprint Review is a working session with stakeholders, focused on feedback.
  • Retrospective leads to 1–2 meaningful improvements, not just discussion.

If your events feel like theatre, fix the purpose before changing the format.

4) Reduce dependency bottlenecks

Many “Scrum Master as PM” behaviours come from organisational friction.

Common causes include:

  • slow approvals
  • unclear decision rights
  • specialist gatekeepers
  • siloed support functions

Treat these as system impediments, not individual performance issues.

5) Use evidence, not opinions

If your organisation wants predictability, measure outcomes that matter.

For example:

  • lead time from idea to Done
  • cycle time for common work types
  • escaped defects or rework indicators
  • stakeholder satisfaction signals from Sprint Reviews

If you want a broader perspective on modern delivery improvement, this is a useful complement: Read how Agile and AI work together ↗

Related reading

Relevant training courses

Conclusion

Scrum Masters are not project managers.

When organisations treat them like project managers, they usually get more control, more meetings, and less agility.

When organisations allow Scrum Masters to coach, facilitate, and improve the system around delivery, teams become more self-managing, more transparent, and more capable of adapting quickly.

Contact us

If you want to redefine the Scrum Master role in a practical way, and create healthier self-managing teams, we can help.

Book a 30-minute diagnostic call ↗

‍

Read other posts

Checkout what else our team has been writing about

Stylised map of Jordan with digital network and bank icon representing banking transformation
February 1, 2026
Agile Transformation in Jordanian Banking: A Practical Playbook for Leaders

Practical guidance for Jordanian banks to deliver faster with stronger governance, using value streams, embedded controls, and a phased 12–18 month roadmap.

May 13, 2025
MTN GSSC Lean Agile Procurement Case Study

MTN, the largest telecoms provider in Africa, has always been synonymous with innovation and transformative change. In recent years, the company has taken a significant step toward driving digital transformation across its entire enterprise with an ambitious vision: to become a fully Agile organisation. ‍In this article, we take a look at how Agility Arabia helped MTN to successfully adopt the Scrum framework within their Global Sourcing and Supply Chain (GSSC) procurement department.

January 7, 2026
2026 Transformation Trends in the UAE: Scaling Delivery, Value, and Control

UAE-focused 2026 transformation trends for decision makers: Scaled Agile delivery, procurement as a lever, AI governance, secure-by-design controls, and value realisation.